Sun. June 25, 2017 Get Published  Get Alerts
Culture as a binding factor in our society, interview with Camilla Habsburg-Lothringen


Interview by Djoeke Altena

We need culture to know where we came from, says her Imperial and Royal Highness Archduchess of Austria and Princess of Tuscany Camilla Habsburg-Lothringen. “In a time where society is complaining, is frustrated and not making the best of what we have, there we need culture. The cultural field enables us to build up dialogues better and faster than administrations can.” Contributing to a better world, that is why the descendant of the Habsburg house which leads back to Holy Roman Emperor Francis I and Empress Maria Therese of Austria, chose the cultural field over a more political career.


How does it feel be the great-great-great-granddaughter of such historical figure like Maria Theresia?

This year we celebrate the 300th anniversary of Empress Maria Theresia’s birth. She was bright and very advanced for her time. Great policy such as the obligation to go to school, the vaccination against chicken pox, the opening of the stock market and the founding of the academy for diplomats was one of the many actions implemented by her. Her strong character and personality as a ruler, wife and mother impresses me strongly

It is a big responsibility to carry this name, it will always be imprinted on me. As it is not easy to fulfill all peoples expectations but I try to be true to myself, not to lose my focus, and keep remembering my history, where I come from.

Do you consider this responsibility to be political?

No, there is no role for me in politics. The time to get involved is very limited. First you have to get elected, and during the mandate you try to do as much as you can – let’s hope so- and then the electorate either replaces or re-elects you. All this makes it difficult to make real changes not mentioning the opponent parties that block every suggestion even if they are good ones

Politicians mostly take responsibility over a certain period. This is understandable because they receive legitimacy over a certain time. But the downside is that many do not understand the responsibility for future consequences of their actions. Monarchies, nobility and family run companies they all have to make careful decisions as these leave an impact and imprint on the future of generations and the empires or business. Politicians should learn from this and vow to take consequences for the effects of their actions in the future.

Besides that I feel that real change should be realis\zed via initiatives.

Do you feel that we need change?

I am pretty thankful to live in a peaceful country with a strong stability like in Austria. But it worries me that people don’t recognize that. In the last years nearly all over Europe I observe the increase of a complaining and unsatisfied society that is questioning everything. Also greed and materialism has become very dominant in our times and this leads to a feeling of emptiness. And so it’s understandable that people become very scared and receptive to any kind of manipulative information that threats this artificial way of life

In our times there is a strong destabilizing fear for the future and other cultures. The result is a lack of focus and investments. Constant worrying will lead us nowhere and won’t enable us to build a strong future. That is something we need to change.

I would say that there is a need for respect. Respect is much stronger than tolerance. The population is growing fast, everybody is getting closer, and more people will live in our countries. Just tolerating others will not be sufficient, we need to respect each other and other cultures and learn from them

Do you see any role for yourself in this?

I have a background in PR and advertising, besides that I am also very active in the field of networking. But most important for me are values: the stability of a society and passing on of ideas and sending impulses. I was never involved in representing companies, firms, but always more looking into the direction of a so called atmospheric PR if you understand what I mean. That is a kind of seismographic feeling towards our environment and our global thinking and acting; searching for solutions, to get together those people who feel and think in a similar way and then move things into action.

Do you consider that to be diplomacy?

Yes. Diplomacy has a very important stabilizing function in this world. I prefer the cultural field because it is neutral and makes it easier to bind people and nations on a diplomatic base. A few months ago I became Director Euro-Mediterranean Diplomacy and Intercultural Affairs at the International Institute for Middle-East and Balkan Studies (IFIMES). In this function I would like to connect the Euro-Mediterranean and Balkan regions and give a voice to those without one. For me that is one of the important aspects of diplomacy.  


Do you feel that the European Union contributes to a better world?


The European project -the European Union, brought prosperity and peace to the continent. But now they are getting lost in a big construction of bureaucracy and regulations like on what kind of energy saving light bulbs we are allowed to buy. There are too many paragraphs blocking any fast action. I find this a waste of energy, time and money. There is a real need for solutions for the bigger problems, like immigration for instance. The European Union should focus on the bigger political issues and on the cultural field.


The near future might be challenging, but we need to keep the dialogue going, because together we can tackle every crisis.


First published by the Dutch Diplomat Magazine

Comments in Chronological order (1 total comments)

Report Abuse
Sat, March 18, 2017 09:33 AM (about 2376 hours ago)
Hire a pro hacker at a reasonable price, for all your identity, internet/ other hack related issues mail Steelbreaker at techie dot com
Quick Links Twitter Face Book Get Alerts Contact Us Enter Ia-Forum Student Award Competition
06/23/2017: What Americans Really Want from Health Care Reform Is Impossible More
06/23/2017: Health Care Bill Would Rescue ObamaCare and Take Democrats off the Hook More
06/23/2017: Leadership on green finance and sustainable infrastructure – how can China and Sweden work together on the Belt and Road Initiative? More
06/23/2017: Laurence Tribe's Impeachment Hysteria More
06/23/2017: If Russia Wants the Syria Mess, Let Them Have It More
06/23/2017: The Labour Party's Disregard for Property Rights Is Extraordinarily Worrying More
06/23/2017: Slave to the Blog: North Korea and the Borderlands More
06/23/2017: Man on the Run More
06/23/2017: Man on the Run More
06/22/2017: Reflection Paper on the Deepening of the Economic and Monetary Union More
06/22/2017: Reflection Paper on the Deepening of the Economic and Monetary Union More
06/22/2017: Reflection Paper on the Deepening of the Economic and Monetary Union: Panel 1 More
06/22/2017: Reflection Paper on the Deepening of the Economic and Monetary Union: Panel 2 More
06/22/2017: New finance for old (technology) problems? Saving the planet with better cook stoves More
06/22/2017: New finance for old (technology) problems? Saving the planet with better cook stoves More
06/22/2017: Trump Would Further Damage U.S. Manufacturing if He Restricts Steel Imports More
06/22/2017: Trump Panders on Cuba, Preferring Cold War over Progress More
06/22/2017: Will Germany Fulfill Its Responsibility for Europe's Defense? More
06/22/2017: The Challenges of Engagement More
06/22/2017: If Trump, Modi talk climate More
06/21/2017: China Does Not Have the Highest Tariffs Among the Big Countries More
06/21/2017: Private Briefing: Survey on India’s Role in the Indo-Pacific More
06/21/2017: Student Activists Hurt the Workers They Try to Help More
06/21/2017: The Case for an American Productivity Revival More
06/21/2017: Take a Look at the New 'Consensus' on Global Warming More
06/21/2017: Marc Noland on Why Sanctions and Inducements on North Korea Don’t Work More
06/20/2017: India, China, and differing conceptions of the maritime order More
06/20/2017: Is China the Most Protectionist Country? No, Not By a Long Shot More
06/20/2017: Is China the Most Protectionist Country? No, Not By a Long Shot More
06/20/2017: Forget About Brexit, Focus on the Euro Area Future More
06/20/2017: Americans want states to pick up federal climate policy slack More
06/20/2017: Why Sanctions and Inducements On North Korea Don’t Work More
06/20/2017: The Eurogroup on Greece: Debt Relief with a Fiscal Straitjacket More
06/20/2017: Keeping the internet open for the future More
06/20/2017: Does Classical Liberalism Have a Chance in South Africa? More
06/20/2017: America Is Getting Sucked into Another Middle East Quagmire More
06/20/2017: I Was in Pyongyang When Otto Warmbier Was Released More
06/20/2017: Cooking: From Full-Time Job to Hobby More
06/19/2017: Pandemics and the poor More
06/19/2017: Puntland’s problems More
06/19/2017: Chinese politics in the Xi Jinping era More
06/19/2017: Taking the edge off U.S.-Russia strategic relations More
06/19/2017: The Price of Ignoring Human Rights: Lost Credibility, Brutal Allies and New Enemies More
06/19/2017: Even Sex Offenders Have First Amendment Rights More
06/18/2017: Trump's Massive Afghanistan Mistake More
06/17/2017: The danger of picking sides in the Qatar crisis More
06/16/2017: Future Development Reads: The future of work for our children and global internet trends More
06/16/2017: Jeff Sessions's Reefer Madness More
06/16/2017: The Border-Adjustment Tax Is No Free Lunch More
06/16/2017: An Old Nightmare Returns: The Balkans Simmer Again More
About | Contact Us | Support Us | Terms and Conditions

All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2002 - 2017