Abstract: The “Metabolism of the Corridor” frames the evolving India-Japan partnership as a shift from traditional, command-based maritime strategies toward a distributed, systemic model of infrastructure and governance across the Indian Ocean. Rather than focusing on territorial control or chokepoints, the partnership cultivates interconnected nodes- ports, data centres, AI platforms, shipyards, cold chains, and critical mineral networks- that circulate capital, technology, and knowledge, embedding participating states into resilient, cooperative systems. This “metabolic” approach emphasizes trust, shared standards, and interoperable digital and industrial networks, integrating economic security, health, defence, and high-tech capacities into a horizontal, ecosystemic order. By moving beyond discrete ODA projects or military-centric frameworks, India and Japan are designing a corridor that operationalizes resilience, reduces reliance on coercive leverage, and positions sovereignty as participation in networked systems. The model reframes India’s role from net security provider via command to orchestrator of circulatory infrastructure, while offering smaller littoral states co-authorship in governance. Ultimately, the corridor envisions the Indian Ocean as a platform of platforms, an ecosystem of flows, rather than a space to dominate-signalling a fundamental reconfiguration of regional power, infrastructure, and maritime governance.

Keywords: Metabolism; Systemic Cultivation; Indian Ocean; Platform; Algorithmic; Maritime governance; Automated Commons

Introduction: From Command to Metabolism

At the very beginning of 2026, a discernible shift in strategic orientation has unfolded in the India-Japan partnership, signalling a departure from legacy paradigms of infrastructure engagement toward a more integrated, systemic, and economically strategic engagement across the Indian Ocean. High-level dialogues convened in Tokyo and New Delhi in early 2026 have elevated cooperation on critical minerals, artificial intelligence (AI), defence technology, and economic security to the forefront of bilateral priorities, embedding these into the broader architecture of maritime and regional resilience.

A January 2026 Executive Policy Brief titled “Indo-Japanese Collaboration on Artificial Intelligence” by the Centre for Social and Economic Progress, New Delhi, identifies Japan as a natural partner for India in advancing AI capabilities. The brief argues that achieving scale and resilience requires leveraging global strengths, especially in areas where India faces structural limitations. In this context, Japan’s expertise in semiconductors, high-performance computing, data centres, and robotics aligns closely with India’s developmental needs and strategic objectives. This strategic assessment aligns closely, as the brief highlights, with Japan’s plan to invest approximately US$68 billion in private-sector funding in India over the next decade. The proposed investment, targeting artificial intelligence, semiconductors, clean energy, and talent mobility, along with a dedicated AI Cooperation Initiative and the broader “Digital Partnership 2.0,” signals a concrete policy response to the complementarities identified in the brief (see also, Parulekar, 2025:93-94). Together, these initiatives reflect a shift from traditional manufacturing-led engagement toward deeper collaboration in AI and other advanced deep-tech sectors, reinforcing the strategic logic of Indo-Japanese technological partnership.

For half a millennium, maritime power was conceptualized as a function of spatial command - naval supremacy over sea lanes, control of key chokepoints like Hormuz or Malacca, and projection of force from bases and fleets (Swartz, 2011; Till,?2018). Throughout the 16th century, the Portuguese naval forces predominated in the South Atlantic and Indian Oceans and the China Seas, with their superior naval technology smashing Arab and Indian dominance. Allied with other North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) navies for over 50 years, Portugal still deploys a small blue-water naval force. (Swartz, 2011).

Under the Command framework, the governance of the Indian Ocean is shaped primarily by state-centric power, military presence, and strategic competition, where control over sea lanes, chokepoints, and maritime territories becomes the central objective. Major powers and regional states prioritize naval bases and expansion, surveillance, and security alliances to safeguard trade routes and energy flows, often reinforcing hierarchical and sovereignty-driven decision-making structures. Institutions such as the Indian Ocean Naval Symposium (IONS) reflect this security-oriented coordination, while the legal architecture of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) provides formal rules that states interpret in ways that protect national interests. In this framework, governance is less about shared ecological stewardship and more about strategic dominance, deterrence, and geopolitical influence across the maritime domain.

Empires and superpowers alike treated the Indian Ocean region primarily as an expanse to be penetrated, patrolled, or dominated, not as an ecosystem of embedded systems and networks. The discursive debate on securitization views the region as deeply securitized due to the wide range of threats and challenges spanning traditional, non-traditional, and transnational domains. (Sakhuja and Prabhakar, 2022:43).

Yet this spatial logic is shifting. The emergent infrastructure architecture co-shaped by India and Japan across the Indian Ocean littoral suggests a transition from territorial command to systemic cultivation. “Systemic cultivation” is the intentional, long-term development of institutional, economic, and normative ecosystems to enable adaptive and resilient governance. If “command” means direct control through authority or force, systemic cultivation means investing in cooperative institutions, supporting economic interdependence, enhancing environmental stewardship, building trust among states and developing shared norms and practices. The ocean is no longer just a “highway” in strategic imagination; to policymakers and planners in New Delhi and Tokyo it is increasingly understood as a distributed corridor of circulation, that of data, capital, diagnostics, therapeutics, maritime awareness, critical minerals, AI capabilities, private investment networks, and institutional trust.

This shift inaugurates what may be termed as the “Metabolism of the Corridor”: a new modality of infrastructural power grounded in enabling flows across distributed nodes rather than monopolizing fixed chokepoints. Metabolism here denotes the capacity of a strategic corridor to convert circulation into resilience, to absorb, process, and redistribute flows of data, capital, materials, and technology in ways that continuously regenerate collective capacity. Power, in this formulation, lies not in static control of space, but in sustaining and optimizing the life processes of interdependence across distributed nodes, whereas littoral and ocean governance is understood as an evolving ecosystem rather than “battlespace dominance” in littoral waters (Till, 2018), or, deploying more naval ships to secure sea lanes.

The 2026 strategic engagements between India and Japan, particularly on economic security frameworks, integrated supply chains (including critical mineral supply linkages), AI policy and technology cooperation, and expanded defence-industrial collaboration, underscore this transformation toward an ecosystem of circulation rather than territorial control.

This emerging order contrasts sharply with Beijing’s “String of Pearls” port-centred engagements (Pherson, 2006; Kaplan, 2010; Sterioti, 2017; Butt and Siddiqui, 2021) or the U.S.’s traditional hub-and-spoke security networks (Cha, 2010; Izumikawa, 2020). Instead, the India-Japan approach aspires to a horizontal order of interoperable systems and shared governance. Its ambition transcends strategic balancing; it gestures toward a civilizational stack, layered digital identity mechanisms, regional payment rails, cold chains for cold chain-dependent commodities (such as fisheries, vaccines and pharmaceuticals), maritime intelligence systems, satellite networks, robust supply chains for critical materials, AI governance mechanisms, and economic resilience frameworks, that collectively embed participating states into collaborative regimes of circulation and resilience.

From Points of Presence to Nodes of Trust

Traditional naval strategy, typified by fixed assets like bases and replenishment stations, prioritizes territorial presence because its power emanates from location and control (Kaplan,?2010). These assets are territorially bounded and inevitably vulnerable: their strategic utility often hinges on local host nation assent and can be eroded by political shifts.

The India-Japan model signals a pivot from territorial dominance to networked indispensability. Infrastructure nodes are being fashioned less as monofunctional outposts and more as multilayered systems embedded within larger regional circuits of exchange:

• Chabahar Port (Iran): Built with significant Indian investment, Chabahar integrates logistics, warehousing, and cold chain capabilities, extending India’s commercial reach into West Asia and East Africa without dependency on Pakistan’s port infrastructure. Chabahar serves multiple dimensions - economic, logistical, and geopolitical - by connecting inland trade corridors and bypassing alternative routes. Given the US position on Iran, it would be inconvenient for Japan to actively participate in the Chabahar project, however, it may work to Japan’s advantage, in the long run. Considering its strong commitment to the “Free and Open Indo-Pacific” vision, Japan is likely to devote greater strategic focus to the western reaches of the Indian Ocean in the years ahead. Japanese participation in the development of Chabahar Port and the International North–South Transport Corridor (INSTC) would likely strengthen Japan’s cooperation with both Iran and India, while also contributing to Afghanistan’s economic recovery.
• Data Infrastructure (India): Under joint India-Japan initiatives and supported by Japanese semiconductor and technology partnerships, secure data processing hubs are being developed that position Indian states like Tamil Nadu as a regional node for storage and processing, extending digital capacity deeper into the Indian Ocean littoral. Under ongoing India-Japan economic and digital cooperation frameworks, Japan has become actively involved in supporting India’s expanding data infrastructure, with a particular emphasis on investment and financing of data centre development and broader digital technology collaboration. Through the Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC), financial support has been extended to NTT Global Data Centers & Cloud Infrastructure India to build and operate large-scale data centres in Indian states such as Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu, helping expand secure data storage and processing capacity in the country. This effort is part of a broader Digital Infrastructure Growth Initiative co-chaired by JBIC alongside international partners to promote digital infrastructure projects, including data centres, connectivity networks, and ICT systems, across India.
• Andaman and Nicobar “Smart Islands” (India): In response to shared concerns over maritime security and connectivity near the Malacca Strait, India and Japan are advancing projects that integrate renewable energy, disaster-resilient infrastructure, and advanced digital connectivity across Andaman and Nicobar Island chains. These initiatives aim to convert island territories from passive waystations into active nodes of communication and computing, enhancing both civilian resilience and cross-domain visibility.
• Shipbuilding Partnerships: India and Japan are actively collaborating to expand India’s shipbuilding capabilities and global share, which currently remains below 1%. Japanese firms such as Mitsui O.S.K. Lines (MOL), Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (NYK), and Imabari Shipbuilding are exploring joint ventures with Indian shipyards to construct tankers and specialized vessels, transfer advanced maritime technologies, and provide technical training. Institutional collaboration through the Japan Ship Machinery and Equipment Association (JSMEA) and the Shipyards Association of India (SAI) is enhancing propulsion systems, navigational equipment, and productivity standards. These partnerships constitute strategic industrial nodes, strengthening India’s maritime infrastructure while embedding Japan into India’s broader regional supply and industrial network.
• Critical Minerals & AI Nodes (2026): In the 2026 India-Japan strategic dialogues, both governments launched a dedicated AI Dialogue and established a Joint Working Group on critical minerals, signalling that technological and resource supply systems themselves constitute nodes in the corridor. These initiatives position AI governance and rare earth/critical resource cooperation at the heart of bilateral economic security architecture, addressing vulnerabilities and building shared industrial capacity.

Taken together, these sites resemble “servers in a distributed network” more than traditional imperial outposts. Sovereignty is operationalized through interoperable infrastructure and shared standards rather than unilateral control. Power accrues from orchestrating flows of goods, data, capital, and technology, that bind partner states into cooperative systems. The principal asset under construction is trust: trust in regulatory predictability, data governance frameworks, and co-designed institutional mechanisms that position partners as co-authors rather than passive recipients of connectivity.

This shift echoes the relational design philosophy articulated by Arturo Escobar (2018) in “Designs for the Pluriverse”, where design is conceived as a world-making practice shaping networks of knowledge, power, and possibility. Escobar’s notion of a “pluriverse”, a world in which many worlds coexist, resonates with an infrastructural model grounded not in hierarchical command but in relational co-creation. Within this framework, India-Japan cooperation represents not merely connectivity strategy, but the deliberate design of a distributed, co-constitutive regional order.

Breaking the Inertia: From ODA to Metabolism

For decades, Japan’s Indo-Pacific engagement was synonymous with Official Development Assistance (ODA)- high quality, sustainable, and transparent, yet often criticized as cautious, slow, and reactive. In contrast, China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) advanced aggressively, rapidly linking ports, railways, and energy infrastructure across Eurasia (particularly Central Asia, South-East Asia and Africa).

The “Metabolism of the Corridor” represents a fundamental break from this older paradigm in multiple key ways:

1. From Bilateral Caution to Horizontal Networking: Traditional ODA projects were discrete- fund a bridge, build a rail line, upgrade a port. These projects were important but remained point solutions rather than integrated ecosystems. By advancing interoperable systems, from digital ID frameworks to cross-border payment rails, AI governance dialogues, critical mineral supply networks, and integrated defence technology cooperation, Japan is scaling beyond discrete infrastructure points toward layered stacks that create systemic value for a broad set of partners. The 2026 Economic Security Dialogue situates resilience and de-risking of supply chains at the centre of bilateral cooperation, reflecting a comprehensive reorientation of engagement.
2. From Defensive Balancing to Generative Cultivation: Earlier cooperation might have been framed as hedging against competitive influence. The corridor’s metabolism emphasizes generative cultivation: building resilient regional capacities in diagnostics, data platforms, supply chains, critical technologies, and industrial ecosystems that are indispensable in their own right. Cooperation on rare earth and critical minerals, supported by structured policy mechanisms and private-sector dialogues, exemplifies this orientation toward generative industrial capacity building.
3. From Passivity to Proactive Scaling: Recent policy shifts signal an end to “wait and see” ODA lethargy and a turn toward high-velocity, private-sector-led integration. Japan’s investment commitments, anchored in expanded economic security frameworks and industrial partnerships, reflect a conscious move to link infrastructure, manufacturing, digital innovation, and defence technology into a coherent corridor ecosystem.
4. Integration of Strategic High-Tech Nodes: The corridor now embeds AI platforms, critical mineral processing hubs, and defence-industrial linkages, demonstrating that infrastructure is no longer just physical; it is also cognitive, technological, and strategic, reflecting the 2026 orientation toward a multi-layered, digitally enabled Indian Ocean corridor.

This transformation recasts Japan not as a cautious donor administering bilateral projects, but as an architect of horizontal connectivity alongside India, leveraging both public and private agency to cultivate a resilient Indo-Pacific ecosystem.

The Automated Commons: Algorithmic Governance

A hallmark of the corridor’s metabolic logic is the prioritization of shared visibility over military patrol presence. Two contemporary systems exemplify this:

• Information Fusion Centre - Indian Ocean Region (IFC-IOR): Hosted by the Indian Navy, the IFC-IOR is a regional maritime security node established in 2018 to enhance shared Maritime Domain Awareness (MDA). It fuses and disseminates maritime data among partner countries, offering a common operational picture of vessel movements and maritime activity across the Indian Ocean. Japan participates in this network alongside other partners, underscoring the data-centric ethos of the corridor.
• Quasi Zenith Satellite System (QZSS): Japan’s Quasi Zenith Satellite System is a regional navigation and positioning system that augments global positioning services, providing highly precise location data across the Asia-Oceania region. Its expansion strengthens shared positional awareness for civilian and commercial purposes, enriching the digital layer of the corridor. In April 2025, the Third Japan-India Space Dialogue focused on shared priorities such as satellite navigation, space situational awareness, international norms, commercial partnerships, and enhanced bilateral coordination within the framework of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad).

Together with AI-led vessel tracking, anomaly detection systems, and algorithmically coordinated logistics, these technologies create layered MDA that narrows informational asymmetries once exploited by dominant naval powers. Smaller states, previously excluded from high-resolution maritime intelligence, can now access advanced situational awareness through such shared platforms. The prioritization of algorithmic coordination and interoperable data systems in 2026 dialogues further embeds computational governance within the Indian Ocean corridor’s metabolic architecture.

But algorithmic governance introduces its own asymmetries and risks. The line between transparency and opacity can blur when opaque algorithmic criteria drive decisions. Who defines anomalous behavior? What standards ensure accountability? These are the deep questions confronting corridor governance. Participatory standards and auditable AI frameworks are critical to ensure that the automated commons enhance agency rather than concentrating digital power.

Bio Connectivity: The Cold Chain as Strategic Infrastructure

The COVID-19 pandemic taught a brutal lesson: health systems, especially in the Global South, can become geopolitical liabilities when essential medical goods are scarce. The corridor’s design integrates biological resilience into its metabolic matrix.

• Biological E (Hyderabad): One of India’s most prominent vaccine manufacturers engaged in global partnerships, Biological E is scaling production and has been integrated into multilateral vaccine production and distribution frameworks. Japanese pharma major Takeda has entered a strategic manufacturing partnership with Biological E. Limited to scale up production of Takeda’s dengue vaccine, TAK-003. Such partnerships extend beyond India’s borders to push affordable vaccine production into Africa and other regions. Biological E, in another example, has partnered with Bavarian Nordic to manufacture chikungunya vaccine for  the endemic low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. The collaboration also includes technology transfer and commercial manufacturing. 
• Cold Chain Initiative: As part of broader health cooperation frameworks, the Quad grouping (India, Japan, Australia, and the United States) has worked to enhance resilience against global supply shocks by supporting the expansion of mRNA manufacturing facilities, vaccine storage hubs, and cold chain logistics platforms- critical infrastructure for ensuring temperature-sensitive pharmaceuticals remain viable from production to delivery. In support of this, Japan committed a $10 million financial assistance package to India specifically for building cold chain facilities to safely store COVID-19 vaccines and other medical products, with implementation support through partners including United Nations agencies to extend storage capacity to “last-mile” health sites. Bilaterally, strategic industrial collaborations are also advancing sustainable and advanced cold chain solutions: Container Corporation of India (CONCOR) has partnered with Japan-based Innovation Thru Energy (ITE) to introduce IceBattery® technology, a passive, power-independent cooling solution capable of maintaining set temperatures (e.g., 2-8 °C) for up to 72 hours without diesel or external power, significantly reducing CO2 emissions (by ~70 %) and transport costs for perishable goods, vaccines, and pharmaceuticals.

Beyond vaccines, agricultural seed vaults and climate resilient storage facilities extend the corridor’s resilience into food systems. Yet centralization of intellectual property and manufacturing expertise remains a challenge: a corridor that circulates vaccines but centralizes patents may inadvertently reproduce structural hierarchies under the banner of resilience.

The integration of biological systems with logistics, data, and manufacturing reflects the corridor’s metabolic logic: resilience is infrastructural and circulatory, not merely additive.

Horizontal Order and Debt Discipline

China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is often described as a vertically integrated, state-directed network with financing tied to strategic geopolitical influence. The India-Japan corridor, by contrast, emphasizes blended public-private financing models that aim to avoid unsustainable sovereign debt. Institutions such as the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC) play roles in shaping fiscal discipline in project financing.

Horizontal order reconceptualizes regional influence as a network of interoperable systems, shared norms, and co-authored governance, rather than hierarchical command. It enables smaller littoral states to act as co-creators of infrastructure and policy, distributing authority and resilience across nodes. This aligns with Escobar’s (2018) pluriversal perspective on design as relational world-making, and Farrell and Newman’s (2020) insights on strategic interdependence, showing how interconnected systems can generate power through participation rather than coercion.

In practice, horizontal order, purposefully encoded in the long term “joint vision”, is reflected in cross-border payment rail initiatives such as NPCI and NTT Data’s UPI collaboration in Japan; digital infrastructure cooperation and co-financing through frameworks involving JBIC and allied partners; shared maritime connectivity projects like Smart Islands; and joint shipbuilding and maritime technology partnerships that operationalize a metabolic architecture of circulation.

Revenue sharing arrangements and quality infrastructure standards are intended to mitigate the “debt trap” narratives associated with traditional development finance frameworks. Ensuring fiscal sustainability is more than economic prudence. It is key to political legitimacy. If infrastructure burdens public finances excessively, claims of shared sovereignty become hollow.

Equally important is standards governance. Competing digital ecosystems (e.g., different digital identity and payments protocols) risk fragmenting the digital commons. A truly horizontal corridor requires not just infrastructure but open, bridgeable protocols and co-authored governance frameworks that treat smaller states as architects rather than passive end users.

Though still at a nascent phase, the Asia-Africa Growth Corridor (AAGC), proposed by India and Japan under the contemporary Indo-Pacific framework, exemplifies this approach. With sustained commitment from all potential partners, the AAGC holds enormous potential to offer an alternative to the BRI by reinforcing horizontal, networked infrastructure development that prioritizes shared governance and fiscal prudence.

From Countering to Cultivating: Immunized Regions

Framing the India-Japan corridor simply as a counterweight to China risks obscuring its deeper generative ambitions. Countering is reactive; cultivation is generative. By embedding resilience into the corridor’s architecture, the partnership seeks to internalize capacity rather than rely on coercive leverage or chokepoints. The corridor’s stack integrates multiple interoperable nodes across economic, digital, industrial, and strategic domains, including:

• Interoperable digital identity systems and secure computation nodes;
• Cross-border payment rails (UPI-linked platforms) connecting regional financial networks;
• Indigenous pharmaceutical and industrial capacity, including shipbuilding and critical minerals;
• Shared maritime intelligence via Andaman smart islands, Chabahar, and joint naval initiatives; and
• Climate-resilient logistics embedded across ports, green infrastructure, and shipping nodes.

As scholars such as Farrell and Newman (2020) highlight, weaponized interdependence enables dominant states to exploit chokepoints in global networks for leverage. A metabolized corridor internalizes resilience, reducing the potential leverage arising from supply chokepoints or sanctions.

Yet resilience can harden into insulation. Without careful governance, resilient blocs risk crystallizing into techno-civilizational spheres that fragment broader global integration. Balancing resilience with openness remains an existential challenge for corridor architects, a challenge recognized explicitly in the 2026 dialogues on economic security and AI governance, which emphasize inclusive standards and interoperability rather than exclusionary blocs.

The Political Economy of the Stack

The metabolic viability of the corridor rests on four material constraints:

1. Debt Sustainability: Avoiding unsustainable sovereign exposure is critical to long-term legitimacy and stability.
2. Digital Sovereignty: Data governance must be shaped to prevent algorithmic subordination of weaker partners or extraction of data rents by more powerful actors.
3. Interoperability: Competing standards in payments, identity, and communications must be bridgeable through open protocols, a key theme in the 2026 India-Japan economic and technology engagement.
4. Cybersecurity Externalities: Increased connectivity creates systemic targets for cyberattacks, necessitating shared cybersecurity exercises and standards as part of joint planning.

These constraints are structural, not optional. They determine whether the corridor evolves into a genuinely shared metabolic system or a patchwork of isolated ecosystems.

The End of the Transit State

Historically, Indian Ocean littoral states functioned as transit points- replaceable waystations along the maritime routes between production hubs and consumption centres. Transit states could be bypassed when alternative routes or partners emerged.

In the corridor model, states become embedded in digital clearing systems, vaccine supply chains, payment rails, satellite uplinks, and data-sharing networks. Geography evolves from passive passage to active processing: a vessel can be rerouted, but a distributed data node or regional vaccine manufacturing hub cannot easily be bypassed without significant systemic cost.

In this context, ownership transforms into participation: sovereignty in the corridor is defined not by possession of land or bases, but by integration into cooperative circulatory systems that produce shared value. This reconceptualization reframes power not as exclusionary command, but as inclusionary essentiality. It echoes the 2026 shift in India-Japan engagement that foregrounds networked integration and shared governance over traditional territorial prerogatives.

“Net Security Provider” or Networked Node?

Within the broader argument of this article, the “Metabolism of the Corridor” reframes India’s aspiration to be a “net security provider” not as a project of maritime command but as one of systemic indispensability embedded in distributed techno-economic networks. Yet this recasting introduces structural constraints that complicate the ambition. By anchoring security provision in co-developed infrastructure, ranging from maritime data fusion and AI governance to critical mineral supply chains and health logistics, India’s role becomes interdependent with Japanese capital and institutional support, particularly through mechanisms such as the Japan Bank for International Cooperation. Strategic nodes like the Chabahar Port illustrate both opportunity and vulnerability: they expand India’s geopolitical reach while exposing it to sanctions risk and regional volatility. Moreover, algorithmic maritime awareness systems and digital payment or identity frameworks may consolidate rule-setting authority in subtle ways, raising questions about whether “horizontal order” genuinely empowers smaller littoral states or simply reorganizes hierarchy through standards and data governance. In this light, India’s security-provider identity is transformed from sovereign guarantor to networked orchestrator, where its influence derives less from fleet dominance and more from the ability to sustain flows of data, capital, minerals, and vaccines, while simultaneously enhancing hard security through intelligence, logistics, and dual-use operational capabilities. The success of this shift depends not on visionary framing but on credible delivery, institutional capacity, and the perception among regional partners that interdependence enhances rather than constrains their autonomy.

As a recent Issue Brief on The Ninth Tokyo International Conference on African Development (TICAD 9) in Yokohama in August 2025 suggests, the India-Japan partnership in the Indian Ocean is increasingly articulated through co-financed connectivity, resilient supply chains, maritime domain awareness, and capacity-building for African littorals rather than overt balancing coalitions. Although, this emphasis aligns “India’s Expanding Role in Africa’s Indian Ocean Littoral” with Japan’s Free and Open Indo-Pacific vision, embedding security in development-oriented frameworks and multilateral institutional platforms, yet it also reinforces the structural reality that India’s regional leverage is mediated through shared financing models, standards-setting practices, and third-country cooperation, making its claim to net security provision contingent on sustained coordination with Tokyo and on the ability to translate corridor-based interdependence into tangible public goods across the western Indian Ocean.

Conclusion: Platforms Over Empires

The engineers and standards bodies shaping fiber-routes, cold storage, interoperable ledgers, and satellite links may not make headline news. Yet infrastructural resilience - boring, stable, distributed - can transform power relations over decades.

In this emerging logic, the Indian Ocean becomes a platform of platforms rather than merely a waterway between continents. If maritime power once meant command of the sea, the twenty-first century may belong to those who cultivate the metabolism of circulation.

The ultimate test of this model is whether it genuinely democratizes agency across the littoral, ensuring that the “Metabolism of the Corridor” becomes a shared pulse, rather than a heartbeat controlled by a few. Only if smaller states truly co-author standards, governance frameworks, and infrastructural logics, rather than becoming subsumed within larger regimes, will this new infrastructure paradigm deliver on its promise of a truly horizontal, resilient Indian Ocean order.

The 2026 India-Japan engagements in economic security, critical minerals, AI, and defence cooperation are important steps in this direction, signalling a shift from territorial command to systemic cultivation that reconfigures not just infrastructure, but the very governance of the Indian Ocean region’s circulatory systems.

Yashwant Singh is Assistant Professor at the Department of Sociology at GITAM (Deemed to be) University, Bengaluru Campus, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. He has an M.Phil. in Sociology from the University of Delhi and Ph.D. in Sociology from University of Hyderabad, India. His research interests include urban sociology and sociology of development. 

References

“India, Japan Launch AI Dialogue, Joint Working Group On Critical Minerals.” NDTV, January 17, 2026. https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/india-japan-launch-ai-dialogue-joint-working-group-on-critical-minerals-10767495

“Indo–Japanese Collaboration on Artificial Intelligence.” Executive Policy Brief, Centre for Social and Economic Progress. New Delhi, January 2026. https://csep.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/INDOâ??JAPANESE-COLLABORATION-ON-ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE.pdf

“Japan to raise investment goals in India during Modi visit.” The Asahi Shimbun, August 21, 2025. https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/15977385

Embassy of India, Tokyo. “Remarks by Ambassador of India at the Event on India-Japan Cooperation.” Embassy of India, Tokyo, September 30, 2024. https://www.indembassy-tokyo.gov.in/public_files/assets/pdf/30.09.2024_Remarks.pdf

Parulekar, Dattesh. 2025. “India-Japan Strategic Cooperation and IPEF: Productive Stability in the Indo-Pacific” in Trilateral Imperatives: Japan-India-EU Cooperation on Economic Security, Edited by Takashi Sekiyama; Jagannath Panda & Tatsuo Shikata. New Delhi: Pentagon Press LLP.

“Strengthening Tech Ties: India-Japan Alliance Deepens to Unlock Next Phase.” NASSCOM Community, August 30, 2025. https://community.nasscom.in/index.php/communities/current-issues/strengthening-tech-ties-india-japan-alliance-deepens-unlock-next-phase

Press Information Bureau (PIB). “India - Japan Joint Vision for the Next Decade: Eight Directions to Steer the Special Strategic and Global Partnership.” Government of India, August 29, 2025. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2161986®=3<=2

Swartz, Peter M. 2011. “Rising Powers and Naval Power.” In The Chinese Navy: Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles, edited by Phillip C. Saunders, Christopher D. Yung, Michael Swaine, and Andrew Nien-Dzu Yang. Washington, DC: National Defense University Press. pp. 1-3.

Till, Geoffrey. 2018. Seapower: A Guide for the Twenty-First Century. 4th ed. London: Routledge. pp. 189-197.

“Indian Ocean Naval Symposium: Advancing India’s Interests in the IOR.” The Diplomat. November 15, 2018. https://thediplomat.com/2018/11/indian-ocean-naval-symposium-advancing-indias-interests-in-the-ior/

“India reaffirms commitment to free and open maritime order at UNSC.” Economic Times (Infra). August 12, 2025. https://infra.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/ports-shipping/indias-strong-commitment-to-maritime-security-at-un-security-council/123254020

Sakhuja, Vijay and W. Lawrence S. Prabhakar. 2022. Maritime Security Complexes of the Indo-Pacific Region. Kochi/New Delhi: Centre for Public Policy Research and Indian Council of World Affairs. pp. 43. https://icwa.in/pdfs/Maritime.pdf

Sterioti, Anthony. “The Significance of China’s ‘String of Pearls Strategy’.” SSRN, April?9,?2017. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2951903 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2951903

Butt, Khalid Manzoor and Sadaf Jan Siddiqui. “Growing Chinese Presence in the Indian Ocean: Prospects and Challenges.” Strategic Studies, 2021; 41(2): 64–81. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48732275

Pehrson, Christopher J. “String of Pearls: Meeting the Challenge of China’s Rising Power across the Asian Littoral.” Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, July?2006. https://www.loc.gov/item/2023692926/

Cha, Victor D. “Powerplay: Origins of the U.S. Alliance System in Asia.” International Security 2010; 34 (3): 158-196. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2010.34.3.158

Izumikawa, Yasuhiro. “Network Connections and the Emergence of the Hub-and-Spokes Alliance System in East Asia,” International Security, 2020; 45(2): 7-50. https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/pantheon_files/files/publication/003-isec_a_00389-Izumikawa_0.pdf

Kaplan, Robert D. Monsoon: The Indian Ocean and the Future of American Power. New York: Random House, 2010.

“Chabahar Port: What New Delhi Gains from the Deal with Iran.” Japan Forward, May 31, 2024. https://japan-forward.com/chabahar-port-what-new-delhi-gains-from-the-deal-with-iran/

“Diversification of Iran’s Diplomacy and its Connectivity Strategies: Focusing on Chabahar Port and the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC).” Middle East Institute of Japan, March 18, 2024. https://www.meij.or.jp/english/research/2023/12.html

Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC). “Loan for Data Center Business of NTT Group in India.” JBIC Press Release, March?31,?2025. https://www.jbic.go.jp/en/information/press/press-2024/press_00149.html

“NIIF’s India-Japan Fund invests INR 500 cr (US$ 57 mn) in EKA Mobility…” NIIF, October 17, 2015. https://niifindia.in/news/niifs-india-japan-fund-invests-inr-500-cr-us-57-mn-in-eka-mobility-to-accelerate-indias-transition-to-sustainable-commercial-transportation/

“India and Japan agree to transform Andaman?&?Nicobar, Lakshadweep into ‘smart islands.’” ET Infra, June?2,?2025. https://infra.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/ports-shipping/india-and-japan-collaborate-to-develop-smart-islands-in-andaman-nicobar-and-lakshadweep/121575707

“Japanese shipping giant Mitsui OSK Liners in talks to build ships in India, aims to lead green shipping.” The Economic Times, September 02, 2025. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/transportation/shipping-/-transport/japanese-shipping-giant-mitsui-osk-liners-in-talks-to-build-ships-in-india-aims-to-lead-green-shipping/articleshow/123656011.cms?from=mdr

“India-Japan Maritime Industries Find New Paths of Convergence.” Japan Forward, October 03, 2025. https://japan-forward.com/india-japan-maritime-industries-find-new-paths-of-convergence/

“Japan Ship Machinery and Equipment Association explores opportunities in India.” ET Infra, August 7, 2025. https://infra.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/ports-shipping/japan-ship-machinery-and-equipment-association-explores-opportunities-in-india/123154142

“India, Japan Launch AI Dialogue, Joint Working Group On Critical Minerals.” NDTV World, January 17, 2026. https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/india-japan-launch-ai-dialogue-joint-working-group-on-critical-minerals-10767495

Escobar, Arturo. 2018. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.

Japan International Cooperation Agency. Operations and Activities in India FY2024-25. April 2025.https://www.jica.go.jp/english/overseas/india/others/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2025/04/04/Operations_and_Activities_in_India_FY2024-25.pdf

“India signs defence pact with EU, joins Japan and South Korea as only Asian partners with such an agreement.” The New Indian Express, January 27, 2026. https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2026/Jan/27/india-signs-defence-pact-with-eu-joins-japan-and-south-korea-as-only-asian-partners-with-such-an-agreement

“Japan: A Steady Ascent: Innovation and International Collaboration in Space.” Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada, August 22, 2015. https://www.asiapacific.ca/publication/japan-innovation-and-international-collaboration-in-space

“AI in Maritime Surveillance: Uses, Risks, and Considerations.” Observer Research Foundation, July 31, 2025. https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/ai-in-maritime-surveillance-uses-risks-and-considerations

“Japanese pharma giant Takeda & Hyderabad’s Biological E join hands to make dengue vaccine.” Deccan Herald, April?16,?2024. https://www.deccanherald.com/business/japanese-pharma-giant-takeda-hyderabads-biological-e-join-hands-to-make-dengue-vaccine-2913642

“Takeda and Biological E. Limited Collaborate to Accelerate Access to Dengue Vaccine in Endemic Areas.” Takeda. February 26, 2024. https://www.takeda.com/newsroom/newsreleases/2024/collaboration-to-accelerate-access-to-dengue-vaccine/

“Biological E. Partners with Bavarian Nordic to Manufacture Chikungunya Vaccine for LMICs in Asia, Africa, and Latin America.” BioPharma APAC, February 25, 2025. https://biopharmaapac.com/news/95/6010/biological-e-partners-with-bavarian-nordic-to-manufacture-chikungunya-vaccine-for-lmics-in-asia-africa-and-latin-america.html

“Japan to provide India $10 mn to help build cold chain facilities for vaccines.” Mint, June 25, 2021. https://www.livemint.com/news/india/japan-to-provide-india-10-mn-to-help-build-cold-chain-facilities-for-vaccines-11624608722732.html

“CONCOR and Japan-based ITE introduce IceBattery® technology to the Indian market.” maritime gateway, November 13, 2023. https://www.maritimegateway.com/concor-and-japan-based-ite-introduce-icebattery-technology-to-the-indian-market/

“CONCOR and ITE Japan collaborate on green cold chain logistics solution.” Rail Analysis, June 28, 2024. https://railanalysis.in/rail-news/concor-and-ite-japan-collaborate-on-green-cold-chain-logistics-solution/

“Countering China’s Expansionism: Japan-India Synergy in Africa Amidst US Aid Retrenchment.” Foreign Policy Research Institute, July 07, 2025. https://www.fpri.org/article/2025/07/countering-chinas-expansionism-japan-india-synergy-in-africa-amidst-us-aid-retrenchment/

Asian Development Bank. India: Fact Sheet. Manila: Asian Development Bank, July 2025 https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/27768/ind-2024.pdf

Japan Bank for International Cooperation. 2025. “JBIC Participates in India–Japan Forum Toward Strategic Partnerships.” May 20, 2025. https://www.jbic.go.jp/en/information/topics/topics-2024/topics_00010.html

Farrell, Henry and Abraham L. Newman. “Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion.” International Security, 2019; 44 (1): 42–79. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00351

“India, Japan adopt landmark joint vision for next decade with focus on trade, tech, mobility.” The Tribune, August 30, 2025. https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/world/india-japan-adopt-landmark-joint-vision-for-next-decade-with-focus-on-trade-tech-mobility/

“NPCI partners NTT for UPI acceptance in Japan.” The Times of India, February?8,?2026. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/npci-partners-ntt-for-upi-acceptance-in-japan/articleshow/124554671.cms

“DFC, JBIC, and Korea Eximbank Expand Partnership With India Through New Framework to Promote Digital Infrastructure Initiatives.” U.S. International Development Finance Corporation, October 25, 2024. https://www.dfc.gov/media/press-releases/dfc-jbic-and-korea-eximbank-expand-partnership-india-through-new-framework

“How Japan Combines Aid, Trade, and Investment in Its Development Cooperation.” Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, September 17, 2025. https://www.kas.de/en/web/auslandsinformationen/artikel/detail/-/content/how-japan-combines-aid-trade-and-investment-in-its-development-cooperation

Khurana, Captain (Dr) Gurpreet S. 2022. “India as a Challenge to China’s BRI”, in Maritime Perspectives 2022: Hard Security Perspectives in India’s Maritime Neighbourhood. Edited by Vice Admiral Pradeep Chauhan (Retd.), Commodore Debesh Lahiri and Captain Kamlesh K Agnihotri (Retd.). New Delhi: National Maritime Foundation. pp. 205. https://maritimeindia.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Hard-Security-Perspectives-in-Indias-Maritime-Neighbourhood-1.pdf

“Explainer: What’s Behind India’s Shift from ‘Non-Alignment’ to ‘Strategic Alignment’ in the Indian Ocean?” Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada, January 29, 2025. https://www.asiapacific.ca/publication/explainer-whats-behind-indias-policy-shift-in-Indian-Ocean-Region

“TICAD 9 and the Indian Ocean: Prospects for India–Japan Collaboration” Issue Brief: MP-IDSA, October 01, 2025. https://idsa.in/publisher/issuebrief/ticad-9-and-the-indian-ocean-prospects-for-india-japan-collaboration